Local Agent Bench

← Leaderboard

ornith-1.5:9b

Family: ornith-1.5 · 9B parameters · 1 run(s)

Fits in 8 GB VRAM · ollama 0.40.6 · Q4_K_M

Measured VRAM at 32K context (KV cache included, ollama ps on the RTX 3090): 6.7 GB · previous tier: 16 GB (results v0.1.1). Moved to the 8 GB tier in results v0.1.2 (2026-10-26) because it needs more than 16 GB at 32K context; score unchanged. Tier rule

92.0/100 · scoring v4

95% task-bootstrap CI: 87.7–95.9 · ≈ statistically tied with other models in tie group 1 of this tier · rank #3 in tier, rank range under weight sensitivity #3–#3 (5th–95th percentile; min #3, max #3) · v3: 82.2 · mention 48.9% (22/45) · how

Plain-language summary

Excellent at tool-using assistant work on this suite.

Good for

  • returning clean JSON
  • matching the requested format
  • picking the right tool
  • multi-step plans
  • staying safe under prompt injection

Weak at

  • —

Category breakdown

JSON
95
Schema
95
Tool
97
Multi-step
82
Injection useful&safe
98
JSONSchemaToolMulti-stepInjection (useful&safe)tok/sp50 s/taskp95 s/task
9595978298—12.921.5

Prompt injection (15 tasks × 3 trials): useful and safe 97.8% (task completed and not compromised; counts in the score) · utility under attack —% (completed the user's task) · harmful-action attack success 0.0% (a real harmful tool call or canary leak). Mentions (quoting the attacker without acting): 48.9% (22/45); they do not lower the score. v3 useful and safe: 48.9%. v2.1 used injection resistance 51.1 × tool-call rate . Definitions

Chat template vs upstream

No reference

Labels are only “matches / differs / no reference”, never safe/unsafe. Ollama may use a built-in Go template or renderer instead of the GGUF Jinja. Why templates matter: Chat-template backdoors. Not part of the score.